11 April 2017

The Motor Chums at Large: Contest at the Airmeet [1973]


[Chapter XIII (“A Contest with Alphonse”) of The Motor Chums at Large, or, In Washington F.D. for Fun and Profit, originally written 11 April 1973]
G
reat excitement attended the election airmeet in Washington F.D. So also did aviators from every part of the American Empire. Airships of all sorts were to be seen—clumsy Prussian Flugmachinen, light Gallic Avions, huge dirigibles and small monoplanes, as well as a good many of novel and original designs.
People of many classes had come, some to take part, and some to merely observe, but all shared a common enthusiasm for the new invention.
In one corner of the grounds a crowd had gathered thickly, so as to watch a race, by no means the first such event of the day. Four aeroplanes of different design were entered, and many of those watching were eager to learn from their performance. Unfortunately a delay in starting was in evidence.
“I guess you’ll just have to forfeit the race,” grinned Clarence Ashton evilly.
“I will not,” retorted the other, “Just because my pilot took it upon himself to get sick. My multiplane will beat your mere monoplane any day of the week.”
“It looks like we aint ever gonna know, don’t it?” observed Ashton sneeringly.
Alphonse Notochord whispered something to the bully. “Gotta get my plane ready,” muttered Ashton, and the two evildoers crept around behind the Yellow Streak.
On another part of the grounds could be found a brisk young fellow addressing a crowd of reporters.
“Then you didn’t come to compete in the races?” challenged a reporter.
“No indeed,” laughed the lad, “I came to-day as a spectator.”
“Is it true that you and the rest of the Motor Chums are working on an aeroplane with hovering capacities, Mr. Wilshire?”
“I’m honored that the world thinks so highly of me,” replied Tom, for indeed it was he, “but it seems that if I believe the papers, the Motor Chums are working on every invention under the sun.”
The shot told. As another reporter pushed forward with a new question, unnoticed by Tom, a slinking figure separated itself from the crowd and left hastily.
Above the grounds drifted the Skyhog, still aloft from the night before. Its deck showed signs of recent strenuous use, for empty bottles were in evidence, littered clothes, and other paraphernalia.
“Geee-sus,” groaned short Ned Eliot, “Where in hell are we, as Dante asked Virgil?”
“At the airmeet,” came the reply from Abby, or perhaps Jan. “Come look at the aeroplanes!”
Ned staggered experimentally to his feet. “I’m sick,” he observed, “sick, sick, sick as a dog.”
Harry was amusing himself by pointing out the different types of ’planes to the girls, while Dick seemed to be letting air out of the balloon. Ned joined the others at the railing, and threw up over the side.
“We’re gonna go down,” asserted Dick, and no-one countered his suggestion.
Somewhere below Alphonse Notochord was standing by as Clarence Ashton, grunting and sweating, checked out the engine of the plane.
“Do you think the ’plane will be ready to go by starting time?” Notochord inquired.
“It damn well better be,” exclaimed Ashton, “I aint losin’ no bet to a thievin’ Michiganian!”
“Well, as long as he can’t get into the air it seems fairly safe,” observed Notochord.
A familiar figure slunk forward. He attracted their attention and whined, “Tom Wilshire’s here at the fair.”
“Goddamn it!” exclaimed Ashton, “He don’t have no business bein’ here. He ought to be in jail back in Freemarket.”
“We were deceived,” observed Notochord. “They must have let him out just as soon as we left.”
“They shouldn’t’ve,” snarled Clarence, “Not on a treason charge.”
“They got to have more cops in their pocket than I thought,” grimaced the sneak, “My files say they can’t get out of anything more’n a misdemeanor.”
“Well, they did,” growled Clarence Ashton. “What’ve your files got to say about that?”
“I suppose that Chinese fellow’s no good,” observed Notochord.
“Probably lost track of them in Freemarket,” complained Ben.
“Well, that’s fuckin’ well finished,” exclaimed Ashton, straightening from his task. “This thing should fly like a hornet.”
Nearby, also preparing for the race, was the Michigander Ashton had alluded to. His preparations seemed mostly to be tearing out his hair and hurling it to the ground with some force.
“Say, what’s your problem?” exclaimed a young lad who had casually strolled up.
“My pilot’s ill, so I won’t have an opportunity to test my ship,” replied the other. “Can you help?”
“I believe so,” replied Tom goodnaturedly. “There’s little I don’t know about running airships.”
“I’m astonished,” exclaimed the Michigander. “You won’t take offense if I ask to see some credentials?”
“Of course not,” grinned Tom, “I wouldn’t take just anybody’s word for it either.” He slipped something from his billfold.
The other’s jaw dropped. “You’re not Tom Wilshire of the Famous Motor Chums, are you?” he gasped.
“That’s what my baptismal certificate says,” returned Tom.
“Well, then I apologize for doubting your ability,” he replied. “Imagine, doubting the ability of Tom Wilshire. I’m Sandy Lanthorn,” he exclaimed, extending his hand.
“I’m glad to make your acquaintance,” replied Tom. “Now, let’s take a look at your ship.”
Tom quickly ascertained that the controls were not so unfamiliar as to cause him any difficulty in handling the craft, and then began to examine the engine.
“Oh, that’s all right,” Lanthorn assured him, “I’ve checked all that myself.”
Tom looked it over for a moment, and then nodded slowly. “It seems all right to me,” he said. “Still, it’s always a good idea to check these things for oneself.”
“That’s true,” agreed Lanthorn. “I just can’t get over it. Me, talking to the leader of the Motor Chums.”
“One gets used to it in time,” Tom assured him.
“I’ve read all the Motor Chums books, you know,” said Lanthorn, “Wonderful stuff. How you do all that I don’t know.”
“Well, I suppose anyone could, if they put their mind to it,” replied Tom.
“Say, is Mr. Simpson around?” asked Lanthorn. “I’ve always wanted to meet him.”
“Mr. Simpson?” questioned Tom. “Oh, you mean Ersatz. No, he’s on a secret mission at this moment. No telling when he’ll be back, if ever.”
“That’s too bad,” observed Lanthorn, “I think he’s the all-round best of the Motor Chums.”
“Your airship works on a novel principle, doesn’t it?” Tom asked. “The arrangement of the wings—seven of them in a circle—is quite unlike anything I’ve ever seen before.”
“Why, yes, I designed it myself,” answered Lanthorn. “The air-flow in the fuselage is much improved that way.”
“Very ingenious,” Tom complimented him. “Is it patented?”
“Not yet,” was the reply, “I wish to determine whether it is worth patenting, first.”
“That’s sound,” approved Tom, taking a few notes, “When does the race start?”
“In about fifteen minutes,” Lanthorn told him.
Soon thereafter the Skyhog landed. Its occupants mingled with the crowd in some excitement.
“Look!” pointed Debbie, “there’s an aeroplane race just starting!”
This proved to be the case, and Dick soon cleared a path through the crowd for the others to follow. They reached the front of the crowd and thus had a fine view.
Four ’planes were involved. One was a bran-new monoplane, the most expensive model Assidual manufactured. The second was a ’plane of unique design, whose wings radiated from a central pivot; the third was a low-wing monoplane of peculiar construction, and the fourth was a biplane familiar to our heroes.
“The Yellow Streak!” exclaimed Ned. “That means Ashton’s in this race.”
“Clarence Ashton the bully?” asked Abby, “the one who’s played you so many mean tricks?”
“Yeah,” assented Dick.
They waited impatiently for the race to begin. Of course they all realized the difficulties involved in the preparations, for if the ’plane is to fly at all the altitude gage must be collaborated with the fuel tank, and the braces suspended from the cockpit, and many other adjustments made.
But a delay of another type was apparent.
“It aint fair to bring in somebody not listed on the official race-sheet,” protested a contestant.
“I’ll bring in anyone I like,” objected another.
A third figure broke in. “You’re a fine one to talk about fairness, Clarence Ashton,” he exclaimed. “Was it fair when you dynamited our newly-constructed electric shovel right before Edison Electric came by to look at it?”
Ned whispered to the others, “Why, that’s Tom Wilshire.”
Clarence Ashton made a gesture of disgust. “Aw, fuck,” he said, “Are you still harpin’ on that? That was a couple of years ago, and you never proved anything anyway.”
“I didn’t have to have proof,” exclaimed Tom, “You’re the only fellow in Freemarket mean enough to pull a stunt like that.”
“That aint so,” protested Ashton, “I’ll bet there’s dozens. Percy Folger’s done lower things’n me.”
“What about you, Tom Wilshire?” suggested Hangdog.
“What about me?” asked Tom calmly.
“You do some pretty good work in the sneaking line yourself,” Ben said deliberately.
“Well, thanks,” said Tom ironically, “Do you mean that I’m a sneak?”
“Damn right you are,” burst out Clarence.
“You got a lot of nerve, calling me a sneak,” observed Tom, “The best day’s work you ever did was losing the dirigible race to me.”
“I won that race,” proclaimed Ashton, “You just nipped in there and grabbed the prize before me!”
“Like blazes you won,” shouted Tom, “I beat you then and I’ll beat you now!”
“I can beat you at airship racin’ any day of the week,” Ashton retorted, “you lowdown sneak.”
“I’ll show you who the sneak is,” blazed Tom, leaping into the pilot’s seat. “Come on, Lanthorn.”
The ’plane motor screeched and wailed as Tom started it. In the other plane Ashton caused the motor to sputter into life, then leaped in beside his crony, Notochord.
All four pilots signaled their readiness. The flagman waved his yellow flags and then the starting cannon boomed in the distance. The aeroplanes started down the runway, and one by one took to the air.
One came to immediate grief. The pilot, perhaps through inexperience, had forgotten to put oil in the fuse-box. The monoplane flipped over and was immediately covered with flame.
The Yellow Streak took to the air without a hitch and ascended rapidly. Ashton wasted no time in speeding the ’plane on its way, but before he was fairly started the Assidual had already vanished.
Wilshire chose a more spectacular mode of ascent. He swooped low over the crowd, spinning the ’plane quickly, and then plowed through a pile of sawdust waiting to be spread. He then knocked the flags from the flagman’s hands, ascended in a quick series of loops and sought the horizon.
“I’ve never seen anyone do things like that with an aeroplane before!” exclaimed Jan.
“Well, that’s Tom Wilshire’s specialty,” observed Ned.
“What is?” asked the girl.
“Doing things with aeroplanes that haven’t been done before,” replied Ned. “I just hope he can still win the race.”
The race course was so set out that the contestants must fly to a tower a mile or so off, circle it, and return to the field. A watcher was situated at the tower to ensure fair play.
There was therefore little for the crowd to see until the return of the aeroplanes. Some in the crowd waited eagerly for the wreck to cool enough for them to come close, so as to get fragments for souvenirs or spare parts.
“It certainly is a shame,” declared Debbie, “that a good fellow like Tom has to compete against low-down scoundrels.”
“They shouldn’t allow people like that Ashton to race,” agreed Abby, or Jan.
“It’d sure be easier to win if they weren’t in it,” observed Ned.
“If only moral rectitude could be turned to our advantage,” murmured Harry.
“Or if we could somehow turn their rascality to account,” suggested Ned.
“Say, now that is a veritable stroke of genius,” commented Harry, a smile encroaching upon his features, “I must make a phone call.” He vanished even as he spoke.
“A phone call to whom?” frowned Jan.
Ned shrugged. “We’ll just have to wait and see.”
Harry’s call apparently did not take long, for he was back at once.
“All right,” insisted Ned, “Knock off the mystery. Who’d you call?”
“I merely placed a call to our friend Ingram,” observed Harry, “and told him that two of the plotters were trying to escape in an aeroplane. Secret Police anti-aircraft guns are being set up to bring them down.”
“Wow! What a stunt!” exclaimed Ned, “That’s clever enough to be a Wilshire plot.”
Anticipation showed on every face when the sound of a returning aeroplane could be heard in the distance. Which of the contestants would it be? A great cheer came from the crowd when it was discovered to be the ’plane which Tom Wilshire piloted. There was no other ’plane in sight.
It circled the field twice and then settled on the earth like a great fly. Ashen-faced, Sandy Lanthorn stumbled out, and stared about him in a dazed manner. The confident young aviator put in an appearance from the other side of the ship, grinning cheerfully. With a flourish, he accepted the prize-money and made a short speech. Lanthorn babbled incoherently and gesticulated violently.
With a bow, Tom finished his speech and strode off the field. The crowd waited for a period of time and then began to drift away also. The other aeroplanes failed to show. Ned and Harry knew the Secret Police had Clarence and Alphonse. But the disappearance of the Assidual was a mystery to them. (And I may as well say here that the mystery never was cleared up, and the fate of the unlucky aviator remains unknown to this day.)

10 April 2017

The Unfolding Disaster in Iraq [2003]


[From my pre-weblog, 10 April 2003]
I
 watched the unfolding disaster in Iraq—widespread looting, a suicide bomber, shooting of locals at checkpoints. Hospitals, universities, cultural sites, private residences—all are being looted and according to rumor people are being murdered in the process. The coalition authorities are doing nothing to stop it. Is there no plan in place for dealing with this? What the hell are the authorities thinking? Or are they encouraging the looting so that when they do crack down they can do so with a heavy hand and claim it is in response to the chaos? God only knows, but the bungling so far in this war is worse than I thought it would be. And all the hard work of the occupation is yet ahead. The far right in America is celebrating a “victory”, but I don’t know on what basis. “Clear the battlefield and let me see all the profits of your victory.”

09 April 2017

Posing in the Moonlight [2010]


[Originally posted 9 April 2010]
Posing in the moonlight
How long can this last
’Fraid we look a real sight
Water having passed
How can we stop this trend (how can we stop this trend)
When will it ever end (when will it ever end)
Driving you round the bend-eh-end-eh-end
Posing in the moonlight—The Hee Bee Gee Bees
A
h, yes, another rant against the clueless. I’m sorry about that—but this guy illustrates something that really bothers me about this whole tribe. I’ve noted previously how people in comment threads who claim to rely on primary sources give themselves away by citing fake quotations, and the other day a perfect example of the species made an appearance in a thread at a topix.net forum. Calling him- (or her-) self Akpilot, he (or she) made a set of assertions so blindingly ignorant that one commenter suggested he should “read a few biographies of our first presidents as well as the members who helped draft the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.” Akpilot claimed in reply:
Actually, biographies are riddled with errors and the personal opinions of the writter [sic]. I much prefer reading the actual writtings [sic] of the founders, I find you get a much clearer picture of them that way… You may want to try this yourself as well. [ellipsis in original]
What makes this claim absolutely hilarious is that he had given examples of his “reading the actual writtings of the founders” some comments earlier, and, as you might expect, they included a number of fake quotations—the 1956 “religionists” quotation falsely attributed to Patrick Henry, for one, and the “ten commandments” quotation falsely attributed to James Madison, for another. His use of these shows Akpilot for the poseur he is—he sure as hell didn’t get them from “reading the actual writtings of the founders”.
So, just for the fun of it, let’s see what else our poseur has to offer. He starts off with an alleged John Adams quotation:
The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.
While our poseur doesn’t give a source, it’s a mangled section from a letter Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson (28 June 1813), part of a famous series. Quite a bit has been silently omitted in this twisted version. Here’s what Adams wrote:
Could my answer be understood by any candid reader or hearer, to recommend to all the others the general principles, institutions, or systems of education of the Roman Catholics, or those of the Quakers, or those of the Presbyterians, or those of the Methodists, or those of the Moravians, or those of the Universalists, or those of the Philosophers? No. The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence, were the only principles in which that beautiful assembly of young men could unite, and these principles only could be intended by them in their address, or by me in my answer. And what were these general principles? I answer, the general principles of Christianity, in which all those sects were united, and the general principles of English and American liberty, in which all those young men united, and which had united all parties in America, in majorities sufficient to assert and maintain her independence. Now I will avow, that I then believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God; and that those principles of liberty are as unalterable as human nature and our terrestrial, mundane system.
The words in bold were those cherry-picked to give a false impression of what John Adams was saying. If our poseur in this case was also the cherry-picker, then he is guilty of deliberately misrepresenting Adams; if not he remains a mere poseur, guilty only of passing off somebody else’s misrepresentation as his own.
Next our poseur quotes part of a famous quip John Adams wrote in a letter to Thomas Jefferson (19 April 1817)—an item so well-known that no special research in “the actual writtings of the founders” is required:
Twenty times in the course of my late reading have I been on the point of breaking out, “This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!!!” But in this exclamation I should have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite society, I mean hell.
This is a great passage for quote-miners; anti-religion types can quote the “no religion” portion, and Christian Nationites the “not fit to be mentioned” piece, but either way, they’re distorting the meaning of the original. Thomas Jefferson’s reply is not as often quoted. He wrote (5 May 1817):
If by religion we are to understand sectarian dogmas, in which no two of them agree, then your exclamation on that hypothesis is just, “that this would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it.” But if the moral precepts, innate in man, and made a part of his physical constitution, as necessary for a social being, if the sublime doctrines of philanthropism and deism taught us by Jesus of Nazareth, in which all agree, constitute true religion, then, without it, this would be, as you again say, “something not fit to be named even, indeed, a hell.”
Having quote-mined Adams Akpilot moves on to Benjamin Franklin's well-known speech in favor of prayers at the Constitutional Convention:
In the beginning of the contest with Britain, when we were sensible of danger, we had daily prayers in this room for Divine protection. Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered… do we imagine we no longer need His assistance?
This (for once) appears to be fairly quoted, as the larger context shows:
In the beginning of the Contest with G. Britain, when we were sensible of danger we had daily prayer in this room for the divine protection.—Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor. To that kind providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? or do we imagine that we no longer need his assistance? I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth—that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?
The vote arose during a critical point at the Constitutional convention, and there was some discussion of the question, but no vote was actually taken, and the matter was allowed quietly to die. Franklin’s manuscript notes:
The Convention, except three or four persons, thought Prayers unnecessary.
I wonder why our poseur left out that item of information.
Next up Akpilot cites a saying attributed to Alexander Hamilton—a quotation in which he cruelly betrays his limitations as a scholar and student of the Founders. His version reads:
I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man.
This item first appeared in this form (“evidences” instead of “evidence” and no ellipsis between the first and second sentences) in Stephen Abbott Northrop’s 1894 A Cloud of Witnesses (p. 208). Northrop in turn attributed to Famous American Statesmen by Sarah Knowles Bolton (1888, p. 126). She gave it like this:
To a friend he said: “I have examined carefully the evidence of the Christian religion; and, if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity, I should unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. … I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man.”
Note that evidence is singular, and especially note the ellipsis. That ellipsis was a bit dishonest; these are not parts of the same quotation, but two different stories jammed together. They come from John Church Hamilton’s voluminous account of his father’s life and times (volume 7, p. 790):
It was the tendency to infidelity he saw so rife that led him often to declare in the social circle his estimate of Christian truth. “I have examined carefully,” he said to a friend from his boyhood, “the evidence of the Christian religion; and, if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity, I should unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor.” To another person, he observed, “I have studied it, and I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man.”
The first item is attributed to the “Reminiscences of General Morton” (presumably Jacob Morton, 1761-1836); the second is unattributed. As both anecdotes are related by his son, we may hope that they reflect Hamilton’s attitude as his son understood it, but they are second-hand at best. They are not Hamilton’s words directly, but only words attributed to him. And our poseur didn’t get them from the son—as his misquotation shows—but only from some late and derivative source.
Akpilot follows this with a mangled version of a resolution by the Massachusetts provincial congress for 15 April 1775 calling for a day of fasting and prayer. He has attributed this to John Hancock, possibly because Hancock was president of the provincial congress at that time. The actual resolution read:
Resolved, That it be, and hereby is, recommended to the good people of this colony, of all denominations, that Thursday, the eleventh day of May next, be set apart as a day of public humiliation, fasting, and prayer; that a total abstinence from servile labor and recreation be observed, and all the religious assemblies solemnly convened, to humble themselves before God, under the heavy judgments felt and feared, to confess the sins that have deserved them; to implore the forgiveness of all our transgressions, a spirit of repentance and reformation, and a blessing on the husbandry, manufactures, and other lawful employments of this people; and especially, that the union of the American colonies in defence of their rights, for which, hitherto, we desire to thank Almighty God, may be preserved and confirmed; that the Provincial, and especially the Continental Congress, may be directed to such measures as God will countenance; that the people of Great Britain and their rulers may have their eyes open to discern the things that shall make for the peace of the nation and all its connections; and that America may soon behold a gracious interposition of Heaven, for the redress of her many grievances, the restoration of all her invaded liberties, and their security to the latest generations.
Another stunning example of Akpilot’s vast knowledge of “the actual writtings of the founders” follows, when he quotes (and slightly misquotes) a 1956 writer as Patrick Henry:
It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.
The story of this bit of trash appears elsewhere; in my view only an idiot would be taken it by it. I can guarantee that our poseur didn’t get it from reading the Founders; it was first attributed to Henry in the 1980s.
Now next our poseur actually gets something right—he quotes a portion correctly from John Jay’s well-known letter to John Murray, Jr., of 12 October 1826. The paragraph in question:
Almost all nations have peace or war at the will and pleasure of rulers whom they do not elect, and who are not always wise or virtuous. Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest, of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.
But our poseur returns to his old ways with the next one, and it’s a doozy. Yeah, it’s the tired old fake Madison quote about the Ten Commandments—and he manages to give it a bogus source as well: “1778 to the General Assembly of the State of Virginia”. (Actually the only genuine bit comes from the Federalist Papers.) He quotes it like this:
We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We’ve staked the future of all our political institutions upon our capacity…to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God. [1778 to the General Assembly of the State of Virginia]
Now I’ve never seen it exactly in this form before, but it’s still the same old fraud publicized by libertarian economist Frederick Nymeyer in 1958. And Akpilot has actually omitted virtually all of the only genuine Madison phrase in the whole piece—“the capacity of mankind for self-government”. This is about as low as it could get. It looks bad for our self-styled expert on the Founders.
Still, he recovers a little ground with his final two (basically genuine) quotations from Dr. Benjamin Rush. Dr. Rush, you may recall, was the guy who thought that the dark skin of Africans was a form of leprosy, and looked forward to the day it could be cured. Dr. Rush’s essay entitled “A Defence of the Use of the Bible in Schools” (written before 1798) included this passage:
…I lament, that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes, and take so little pains to prevent them. We profess to be republicans, and yet we neglect the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government, that is, the universal education of our youth in the principles of christianity, by means of the bible; for this divine book, above all others, favours that equality among mankind, that respect for just laws, and all those sober and frugal virtues, which constitute the soul of republicanism.
Other than mangling the end with a silent omission, our poseur did pretty well on that one. Earlier in the piece Rush had written about “the eternal and self moving principle of LOVE,” and our poseur now backs up to catch his comment there:
It concentrates a whole system of ethics in a single text of scripture. “A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another, even as I have loved you.” By withholding the knowledge of this doctrine from children, we deprive ourselves of the best means of awakening moral sensibility in their minds.
By omitting the first sentence and substituting “[the Scriptures]” for “this doctrine” Akpilot makes it look as though Rush were talking about the Bible in general, rather than one doctrine in particular, but otherwise the text is fairly quoted.
Now I’ve got to say that for a person who spends a lot of time reading the words of America’s Founders, this is a piss-poor showing. Some of these quotations are now so putrid even the loons won’t touch them. Personally, I don’t think Akpilot is ready to read serious biographies of the Founders. Not up to speed, yet—far from it. I think he should start with some popular histories of the time, something that would give him the feel for the times. Then, maybe, he could move on to some light biographies, and start working his way through some of the key essays of the Founders—portions of Franklin’s autobiography, perhaps, and some of the Federalist Papers. Once he knows his way around a bit, then he could start on some serious works. And then at last, if all goes well, he’ll have some chance of making sense of whatever out of the vast array of papers left us by the Founders he chooses to read.
Anyway, it’s worth a shot.
There are a lot of people out there who have actually spent their time reading the actual writings of the Founders and Framers and (for that matter) their opponents. Not only reading them, but locating them, editing them, and making them available for people to investigate and learn from. Akpilot would do well to actually learn from them, and not just pose as somebody who has. Especially with an effort so lame as that one.

08 April 2017

“there are a lot of mediocre judges”


I am a southerner by ancestry, birth, training, inclination, belief and practice. I believe the segregation of the races is proper and the only practical and correct way of life in our states. I have always so believed, and I shall always so act. I shall be the last to submit to any attempt on the part of anyone to break down and to weaken this firmly established policy of our people.—G. Harrold Carswell
I
n 1968 the Democratic Party, seriously crippled by Lyndon Johnson’s decision not to seek reelection and by the assassination of frontrunner Robert Kennedy, essentially threw in the towel by choosing Vice-President Hubert Humphrey (“Second fiddle’s a hard part I know When they won’t even give you a bow”) to run against Richard Nixon redivivus. With the new (white) South ready to turn on the party that had betrayed it with what their politicians liked to refer to as the Civil Wrongs Act, Nixon was swept into office as a “law and order” candidate, with the southern states going either for him or for the segregationist George C. Wallace, a former Dixiecrat running on the American Independent ticket.
Once in office Nixon was determined to cement the new understanding between the racist ex-Democrats and the new Republican Party by stacking the Supreme Court (as best he could) with their kind of people—white southern racists. His first attempt was the nomination of Clement Haynsworth, a South Carolina judge who could be relied upon to rule in favor of segregation and against labor no matter the cost. The Senate, however, declined to rubber-stamp him, voting against him 55 to 45. (As an illustration of how party loyalties have changed since then, let me observe that 19 Democrats crossed party lines to vote for Haynsworth, while 17 Republicans crossed party lines to vote against him.)
Nixon’s next nomination was bizarre: G. Harrold Carswell from Georgia. A thoroughly mediocre jurist (one Senator defended him by saying that mediocre people deserved to have representation on the court too), his anti-equality stance was well-known. Unfortunately, he had not kept quiet about it; in a 1948 speech he had openly acknowledged his racist views. In an address to the American Legion he had espoused his “firm, vigorous belief in the principles of white supremacy, and I shall always be so governed.” Taking him at his word, on 8 April 1970 the Senate rejected him 51 to 45, a closer vote than the one on Haynsworth, though between these two sorry excuses for human beings Haynsworth was clearly the better choice. 
Nixon blamed the whole sorry spectacle on the Senate, saying that in the present environment it was impossible to get a southerner appointed to the Supreme Court—which was probably true enough, assuming that you keep in mind the unspoken requirements that he be white and racist. Had he been willing to venture out a bit further, maybe he could have found somebody suitable who hadn’t made white supremacist speeches, or proclaimed his eternal devotion to segregation. Whether the appointment of (say) an African-American civil rights leader from the south would have served his political ends, is another question altogether.

07 April 2017

It's Like a Whole Different World [1995]


[A passage from my journal, 6/7 April 1995]
♂♂
before 4:20 pm—Four days ago. At this point it’s hard to remember events before the break-in; it’s like a whole different world. Seems like I must have got up some time Thursday evening; my father would have been here recovering from the biopsy. He spent the night, I think; maybe we talked or something till fairly late. I have this feeling that I didn’t get any photography done for some reason, but I don’t know what it was. Part of it may have been that I’ve been working on the machine here at night since the monitor (the old monitor) had faded to such an extent that I could not see it well in the daytime. Anyway, my father was up and around on Friday, and we started to get something done, or at any rate made preparations. At one or so we both headed off, he for Canby and I for bed. I was just drifting off when I heard a series of crashing sounds downstairs. It was difficult to tell what they were, so I got up, got dressed, and grabbed my metal club I usually carry when I investigate things; this has been my habit ever since my bicycle was stolen on Christmas Day, 1993. I didn’t see any cars out front, in the driveway, or in the parking lot next door, so I headed downstairs to investigate.
The truth is, I didn’t really expect to find anything out of the ordinary. I thought maybe my brother or sister-in-law had stopped off with one of the kids, either before or after a Kaiser appointment, or else that the sounds were coming from next door. When I walked into the music room I did not expect to suddenly confront two people, a man and a woman, carrying off my stereo equipment.
They didn’t expect me either. To my own considerable sur­prise I advanced into the room with my club in hand and demanded, “What the hell’s going on down here?” Both promptly set down the items they were carrying and the man said that a man had said they could help themselves to anything in the house. As we ex­changed inanities, they quickly threw together a story to the effect that this guy had told them he was moving, and had hired them to carry stuff out of the house. The fact that he had smashed in the back door to get in apparently didn’t worry them. The woman quickly excused herself and said she would wait at the Shamrock. The man, who said his name was Daryl and he was on parole, hung around for awhile, making conversation and offer­ing to help fix the door. As far as I can tell all they got was the AKAI and the CD player, besides some change and some unused Beta tapes. I may well have overlooked something. They overlooked over a hundred dollars in one of the drawers in the kitchen, but I guess they were fixated on stereo equipment. “Daryl” admired my Roland, and said that he played the drums; this did not inspire me with much confidence, so I promptly spirited the Roland away myself, banishing it until security is better.
Well, my father arrived soon after that, and the rest of the day was taken up with explanations, plans, and repairs. My brother built a bar for the back door, and we boarded up its window; my father nailed boards temporarily across the gate. He reported the incident to the police and an officer came out to investigate. From the questions he asked I suspect that he had some idea of who was involved. Eventually everybody left, leaving Glide [my brother’s dog] behind for company. I crashed out, late and with difficulty. Talked with my nephew, my other brother, and a friend at various points in the evening.

06 April 2017

It's About Goddamn Time [1999]


[From my pre-weblog, 6 April 1999]
O
ne of the ongoing themes of early April is this goddamn Serbian situation. I don’t really have anything to say about it, except that this has been a long time coming, and frankly is overdue. I’d like to say something profound about the whole bit, but really all I can say is that it’s about goddamn time. If there was one lesson to be learned from World War II it was that some people have to be stomped on early. NATO should have stomped the Serbs ten years ago. I sure as hell don’t agree with these morons who are saying that the world hasn’t given diplomacy a chance—what went wrong here (like what went wrong at Munich) was too much velvet glove and not enough iron fist. And this is coming from somebody who believes in negotiation whenever possible. But there is a point when negotiation is futile, and one of those points is when you’re dealing with somebody who will not keep an agreement. What the hell is the point? And when that somebody is a murderous thug like the current ruler of Yugo­slavia, then negotiation is a criminal activity. You don’t nego­tiate with criminals; you stop them. And we’ve been past the time for negotiation for a hell of a long time, and too many people have died as a result. And the spectacle of Serbians prancing around wearing targets and listening to music while their own police and army slaughter Albanians by the thousands is one hell of a note to end the millennium on. Allah have mercy on us all.

05 April 2017

Forty-five Years Ago Today


A
 violent thunderstorm transformed into a tornado, crossed the Columbia River, and hit Vancouver without prior warning at 12:51 pm on 5 April 1972. Six people died and many were injured. The south wall of the Sunrise Bowling Lanes collapsed, killing one young woman instantly, but the north side retained integrity long enough to allow around forty other people to escape. Debris smashed into a house across the street, pinning a man there for hours, and crushed a car in the Waremont discount store parking lot (72nd and Fourth Plain), killing another young woman and her two children. Still another young woman and her child were killed when the concrete wall of the store collapsed; some twenty other people were injured in the store but survived. The storm destroyed Peter S. Ogden school completely, but, even though it was in session, nobody was killed. Teachers and students from Fort Vancouver High School raced over to the elementary school to rescue the victims; in some cases (to my knowledge) students helped find and rescue their younger brothers and sisters.
Across the Columbia River at KOIN my father read on the teletype that a violent windstorm had gone down Fourth Plain destroying everything in its path, or at least that was his impression of the report. With visions of our house in ruins, all of us homeless, me picking disconsolately through the rubble looking for my iguana, he frantically tried to call home—but for some reason the lines weren’t working.
In point of fact I slept through the storm. I woke up briefly to hear wind rattling my window and what sounded like hail battering the roof, but it was only a partial awakening. I could hear sirens in the distance and I vaguely wondered if there were some kind of emergency in progress, but it was my sleep-time, and my body was adamant that I strictly observe it come hell and/or high water.
I woke up a couple of hours later, and learned of the progress of the disaster on the radio. I heard that the roof had collapsed at Peter S. Ogden school, “killing and injuring god only knows how many people” and I started pulling on outer wear to cope with the rain that was pouring down, intending to go down to help. Before I could leave my brother returned from his trip out; he reported that the police had the area cordoned off and were turning back would-be rescuers. We turned on the television to see what we could learn—the kid show “Ramblin’ Rod” was in progress. “Sure was windy out today,” he observed breezily.
Somewhere in here my father was finally able to get through on the telephone. We informed him that everything was all right here, though by this time he was probably better informed on the larger picture than we were. The storm had not traveled along Fourth Plain, but had merely crossed it a couple of miles from where we lived; our damage was minimal to nonexistent. And there were other calls to be fielded from anxious friends and relatives who had heard the news but were not clear on our local geography. 
There was some controversy at the time over whether the storm was in fact a tornado; some witnesses described it as one but the National Weather Service declared it to be a violent thunderstorm (as did the Oregonian). The handful of people I knew who had seen the storm said that there was no sign of the characteristic funnel of a twister, but other witnesses on television and in the newspapers were equally certain that they had seen it. When I had occasion to look the event up two or three years later the National Weather Service was still describing it merely as a violent storm. I don’t know what happened over the years to make them change their mind, but the National Weather Service now (2017) describes it as an F3 tornado. Either way, it took its toll of lives and property in its brief existence.

04 April 2017

Saint Martin Luther King [1968]


[Passage from my journal, 4 April 1968]
6:19 pm PST—Oh God, I don’t have anything to say. What can be said when a great man dies? I hate the men that killed him—and I shouldn’t hate them. I hope that they die—and I shouldn’t wish for any man’s death. A great man is gone; a saint has died. Now there is no one—there is nothing.
Some men teach lessons
Some give lessons by their lives
Some men only hate
And in hating they die.
And they then kill.
Saints depart from the world—
Some quietly—
Some violently.
Lao-tse…
Jesus…
Einstein…
Saint M…

03 April 2017

Discouragement [2008]


[Journal passage, 2/3 April 2008]
♃♀
 before 7:08 m PDT—I’m discouraged at the moment. I had high hopes of selling that antique sheet music I’ve been hanging on to for the past thirty years; prices are looking reasonable, though sales through the internet (judging from others who are selling similar artifacts on eBay) appear to be shall we say hit and miss. There is some interest in the stuff, but the people who seem to be having the most success are those who sell it in lots, rather than as individual pieces. Price seems to be about $5.00 per piece, but drops to $1.50 or less when sold in lots. (Around $12.00 for a lot of ten, actually.) Some people seem to be buying it for framing, because the pictures are attractive and period pieces.
A box containing about two hundred pieces of sheet music had ended up on the porch by the door, where it seemed to me to be safe enough. I mean, who would take something like that, right? I’ve been pulling random pieces from it and checking the song and composers out on the internet, with some interesting results, but no stunning rarities or anything like that. Still, some of these people are being collected, and at least one of them had a kind of interesting life story. But—
Today, believe it or not, somebody stole the box from the front porch, along with a suitcase, 3X5 file box, and some other stuff. When I went out in the morning, they were all gone. I spent a large part of the day going up and down the street to see if they had been discarded anywhere nearby, but no luck. Not a sign of any of the stuff.

02 April 2017

Status Report: Sad


W
ell, there’s brawling in the cockpit and our pilot (who boasts of never having flown anything larger than a paper plane before) sooths the passengers with enigmatic observations about how he’s going to go after his opponents come the next refueling stop. And the passengers cheer them on. Incompetency reigns at all levels, but at least for the moment we’re still getting our little sacks of nuts and a choice of beverages. And so far we haven’t run into anything.
But how long can we continue flying blind?

01 April 2017

A Crown With a Tail [1997]


[Passage from my journal 1/2 April 1997]
5:19 m PST—(clear, 3) This is bullshit, but I thought maybe I’d play a little with this journal-writing business—on paper here, right? To be entered into the computer later, revised if necessary. Whatever.
Up today around two or three and got going slowly. I’ve been slower than ever since my father died. I decided that the one thing I could get done today was to take care of getting the Ireland history book back to the library. I did it. I’m still stuck with the North Portland branch, so I started off walking. It was sunny out but chilly—I debated taking sweater but had on a flannel shirt, T-shirt, jeans—warm enough. I was just thinking maybe I should have worn the sweater when I saw a girl crossing Going in front of me—white shorts, thin green top. Bare arms, bare legs, looking quite comfortable.
So, I dumped the Ireland book, put a hold on it, got receipt and picked up Bancroft (History of Oregon volume 2)—it was there though I was not notified. I walked home. The whole trip took fifty minutes (including library time).
I worked on journal transcripts for 1973—added scattered entries in March, October—no continuous stuff. I worked on reconstructing the manuscript history of the first Motor Chums novel.
My brother came by. I paid garbage, storage, and house payment.
Saw the comet—a weird spiky thing, like a crown with a tail.
I watched the first episode of Taxi.
Copyright © 2005-2024

StatCounter