29 February 2024

Thinking About Leap Day

Today is 29 February 12024, one of the rarest days on the Gregorian calendar, in that it comes in fewer than one out of every four years. The day exists to help keep the calendar in sync with the seasons, the main reason for having a calendar, as far as I can see. Other options have included inserting an occasional extra month, or appointing a committee to devise ad hoc measures to keep the calendar working. The Muslims came up with a radical Monkey-D-Luffy solution to the difficulty—“You know, I’ve been thinking about it—and who cares?” Let the calendar be out of sync with the seasons; there are other things to worry about.

Families with a child born on 29 February have a sort of dilemma, however—how are birthdays going to work? Celebrate the kid’s birthday once every four years, and maybe give her four times the number of presents to compensate? Or appoint a substitute day in three years out of four—maybe 28 February or 1 March? Or abolish birthdays altogether? And what about famous people born that day? When do we note their birthdays on the calendar?

Well, how many of them can there be? you ask. Looking online I find that there are a large number of them, including Jimmy Dorsey (11904), Dee Brown (11908), and Dinah Shore (11916). I, however, am going to note the two who stick in my memory—Gioachino Rossini (11792) and Tony Scheuren (11948)

Gioachino Rossini was a composer of operas, a form I’ve never become comfortable with, though I’ve watched or listened to more than my share, maybe. But one piece of his—I’m sure you already know what it is—was a favorite of mine when I was very young. We had a record that I used to listen to fairly often. Looking at album covers online tells me it was The Nutcracker Suite as performed by Arturo Toscanini and the NBC Symphony Orchestra, released in 1953. Besides the title track it contained “The Skater’s Waltz” and—you guessed it—“The William Tell Overture.” I liked the overture because it conjured up pictures in my mind: an outdoor scene, followed by a storm, followed by a peaceful interlude afterwards. The final portion, that suggested horses galloping to my mind, didn’t seem to me to fit with the rest, but it did make a dramatic conclusion to the piece, so I accepted it. When we got a TV in 11956 or 11957 I was disappointed to discover that the composer had just strung together bits of cartoon soundtracks and the Lone Ranger theme song, but I still liked the result. Our copy had an annoying skip during the storm-aftermath sequence, and to this day I sort of expect the music to repeat until somebody gently moves the needle over to the next groove.

Sometime during grade school—probably third or fourth grade, before I discovered science fiction—I read a biography of Rossini in the school library. I remember it as being rather depressing, maybe because the composer’s life was rather dull, and he spent a lot of it not composing. The one thing that did stick in my mind about him wa that he was born on 29 February; I believe the book said something like Although he died at the age of 76 he only had 18 birthdays.

Tony Scheuren was also a musician, though in a different era and a different idiom. A talented multi-instrumentalist, he left behind a legacy of mostly-unheard tapes. He was in the bands Ultimate Spinach and Chamaeleon Church, and was in the cast of National Lampoon’s Lemmings. His songs were aired on the National Lampoon Radio Hour and on albums derived from them.

He was a gifted parodist. His songs sounded uncannily like the works of his targets. “Riding Out On a Rail” (Grateful Dead), “Old Maid” (Neil Young), “What About Re-upholsterers?” (Johnny Cash), “Methadone Maintenance Man” (James Taylor), “Born-Again Bob” (Bob Dylan), St. Leonard’s Song (Leonard Cohen, words by Sean Kelly), and my favorite, “Bleeding Heart” (Cat Stevens) are perfect gems of their kind, from the guitar-work to the vocal mannerisms. When he died in 1993 he had had only eleven birthdays, though he was forty-five.

26 February 2024

Notes on 26 February 12024

It’s 26 February 12024 and I feel like writing something—pretty much anything, actually. I’m working on a text of Jane Austen’s Persuasion, based on what I can recall of R. W. Chapman’s work, and utilizing the 1818 text (the only authority derived from Jane Austen’s (lost) manuscript) as a basis. I was going to read the Project Gutenberg text, but it’s so filled with careless errors (“reference” for “deference”, for example) that I had to give up on it. All my Jane Austen (except for a volume of the minor works) stuff is in storage, or maybe lost completely, so I can’t just pull it down from the shelf when I want to.

Persuasion (and this is mostly from memory) is the last of Jane Austen’s finished novels, and it was published posthumously along with Northanger Abbey, which her brother had rescued from a publisher who had bought it but not printed it, thus losing the chance to be a footnote in history. Jane Austen was working on another novel when she died, this one satirizing hypochondria and the institutions that preyed on its sufferers. Persuasion is probably my fourth-favorite Jane Austen novel, coming after Emma, Pride and Prejudice, and Northanger Abbey. (If Love and Friendship were to be counted in the total it would be my fifth-favorite.)

Northanger Abbey has a special place in my heart as it was the first Jane Austen novel I read. Some oddities in it were explained by examination of a more reliable text; I seem to remember that “baseball” had been substituted for “cricket” on its first appearance and “cricket” omitted on its second, where cricket, base ball, and riding about the country were noted as Catherine Morland’s favorite activities rather than reading books of useful knowledge. It could have been something else. The text was unusually corrupt, to my mind, as I saw when I got a look at a decent edition—probably R. W. Chapman’s.

Life continues, anyway. For the moment. We’ll see.

Copyright © 2005-2023

StatCounter