I believe that through mutual consideration and the revival of
civility as a shared medium of dialogue we are better equipped to
reconstructing a more enlightened society.
I believe that murdering people for expressing an opinion you
dislike, or for drawing a fucking cartoon for god’s sake, is the height of
incivility. If civility is to be enforced by gun-wielding thugs and beheadings
and crucifixions I believe I’ll pass, thank you very much.
I endorse emphatically the Declaration of Global Civility
I don’t. It is an empty document of meaningless phrases that
nowhere spells out why some people should have the right to, however politely,
tell me to shut the fuck up about things that matter to me. “We recognise that
individual or collective human dignity is a fundamental right and that the
desecration of such through insult, denigration or humiliation is morally and
ethically wrong.” And how does my pointing out that an allegedly historical
figure may not match the depiction preferred by some group of Islamic pundits
masquerading as “scholars” (but holding actual scholarship in contempt) turn
into “insult”, “denigration”, or “humiliation”? “Passionate emotions must be
harnessed and channelled through good manners and etiquettes [sic] to civilise
any debate in our diverse society.” How does the murder of cartoonists and
filmmakers square with “good manners” and “etiquettes”? If murder and civility
walk together hand in bloody hand then I want nothing to do with either of
them.
I call upon the British Parliament to table a debate in both Houses
of Parliament to discuss the endorsement of the Declaration of Global Civility.
Not being British I don’t call on the British Parliament to do
a goddamn thing, but I do hope it will treat this call with the silent contempt
it deserves.
I call upon all civilised people and institutions globally to
disassociate themselves from any actions that are an affront to global
civility.
I absolutely disassociate myself from this petition and the
murderous thugs (or “scholars” as they like to call themselves) promoting it. I
absolutely disassociate myself from any organizations supporting its criminal
objectives. Talking about “civility” with people who think it is compatible
with shooting and beheading people is not only futile—it is tacitly supporting
them in their criminal delusions.
I denounce the actions of all those people who are connected with
the production of the film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ and the publishers of the cartoons
of the Holy Prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him and believe that these actions
are an affront to the norms of civilised society.
I actually do denounce the actions of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula—not
for putting together a film depicting the imaginary prophet Muhammed as a real
buffoon, but for tricking actors into taking part in something they were
opposed to, and for claiming that unnamed Jewish backers were behind the thing.
That was both unethical and despicable. Not absolutely vile like shooting a
cartoonist or murdering a filmmaker—but definitely despicable. But that has
nothing to do with this apology for thuggery and murder, and I absolutely
denounce the people who are connected with the “Declaration of Global Civility”
and this dumbass petition. And while I have respect for the accomplishments of
the historical figure (whoever he was) responsible for the cultural
constellation that is Islam, I have nothing but contempt for the imaginary
prophet Muhammed (fuck him and the horse he rode off on) of these "scholars" and their idiot followers. To them I say Mend your ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment